Return to Blog

Rick Perry: Hunt acquisition of Oncor threatens Texas’ power grid

Reliable electricity is the expectation of Texas consumers. The strength and reliability of the electrical grid are the lifeblood of our strong Texas economy.

As the Public Utility Commission (PUC) considers a bid by Hunt Consolidated Energy to purchase the state’s largest electric transmission and distribution company, Oncor, I am very concerned the Hunt proposal, if approved, could compromise reliability and potentially increase costs and risk for Oncor’s more than 3 million North Texas customers.

One can’t view the proposed purchase in a vacuum. It is the outgrowth of the failed leveraged buyout of TXU by Energy Future Holdings. They risked billions in hedge fund investor money, only to see it lost when natural gas prices plummeted. I was governor at the time of the buyout, and I supported it. I have learned my lesson. And the lesson is this: the electrical grid is too important to be entrusted to hedge fund investors who are more interested in making huge profits than running an electric company.

The saving grace of the TXU leveraged buyout is that PUC regulators insisted that the transmission and distribution portion of the TXU business be ring-fenced from the retail and generation arms, providing protection for Oncor and its customers. So today, Oncor continues to provide service and is protected from bankruptcy. But I fear the protections for Oncor that exist today will be eroded if Hunt Consolidated’s proposal is approved.

The Hunts’ name is a good name, and not just in Dallas but throughout Texas. And for good reason. Their name is synonymous with success. But it is worth noting that the vast majority of the investment capital for the purchase of Oncor comes not from the Hunts but from hedge funds and other financial firms, some of which were involved in the failed buyout of TXU. Many of those funds are back, and they have come up with a creative scheme: to reformulate Oncor as a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT).

REITs are common for strip malls and hotels. But it has never been tried for an electric utility the size of Oncor. I have several concerns about the proposed Hunt REIT. First, a minimum of 90 percent of taxable income collected must go to shareholders of any REIT. Despite this, Hunt and its financial backers propose to collect hundreds of millions of dollars in non-existent income tax expenses through customer rates, and send that money to shareholders rather than the IRS.

Second, though the Hunts and purchasers have said they are reducing billions in debt obligations held by Energy Future Holdings, the reality is obligations above Oncor will increase because new investors in the REIT require distributions of 90 to100 percent of taxable income. Because of this, it is important the current ring-fence remain in place or be strengthened.

Third, with the REIT structure, Oncor would be split up into two companies: an asset company owning $11.8 billion in physical assets, and an operations company that would lease those assets — and assume the large percentage of Oncor’s payroll — with only $150 million in capital. There are serious questions as to how Oncor could respond to a major weather event, and resulting massive outages, with such thin capitalization at the operating company.

Read the rest at DallasNews.com

Disclaimer: Although the information contained herein is from sources believed to be reliable, TFS Energy Solutions, LLC and/or any of its members, affiliates, and subsidiaries (collectively “TFS”) makes no warranty or representation that such information is correct and is not responsible for errors, omissions or misstatements of any kind. All information is provided “AS IS” and on an “AS AVAILABLE” basis and TFS disclaims all express and implied warranties related to such information and does not guarantee the accuracy, timeliness, completeness, performance or fitness for a particular purpose of any of the information. The information contained herein, including any pricing, is for informational purposes only, can be changed at any time, should be independently evaluated, and is not a binding offer to provide electricity, natural gas and related services. The parties agree that TFS’s sole function with respect to any transaction is the introduction of the parties and that each party is responsible for evaluating the merits of the transaction and credit worthiness of the other. TFS assumes no responsibility for the performance of any transaction or the financial condition of any party. TFS accepts no liability for any direct, indirect or other consequential loss arising out of any use of the information contained herein or any inaccuracy, error or omission in any of its content. This document is the property of, and is proprietary to, TFS Energy Solutions, LLC and/or any of its members, affiliates, and subsidiaries (collectively “TFS”) and is identified as “Confidential.” Those parties to whom it is distributed shall exercise the same degree of custody and care afforded their own such information. TFS makes no claims concerning the validity of the information provided herein and will not be held liable for any use of this information. The information provided herein may be displayed and printed for your internal use only and may not reproduced, retransmitted, distributed, disseminated, sold, published, broadcast or circulated to anyone without the express written consent of TFS.